Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of infraclavicular axillary vein diameter and collapsibility index with general anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: an observational study

BMC Anesthesiology volume 23, Article number: 340 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The collapse index of inferior Vena Cava (IVC) and its diameter are important predictive tools for fluid responsiveness in patients, especially critically ones. The collapsibility of infraclavicular axillary vein (AXV) can be used as an alternative to the collapsibility of IVC (IVC-CI) to assess the patient’s blood volume.

Methods

A total of 188 elderly patients aged between 65 and 85 years were recruited for gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia. Ultrasound measurements AXV and IVC were performed before induction of general anesthesia. Patients were grouped in accordance to the hypotension after induction. ROC curves were used to analyze the predictive value of ultrasound measurements of AXV and IVC for hypotension after induction of anesthesia. Pearson linear correlation was used to assess the correlation of ultrasound measurements and decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

Results

The maximum diameter of AXV(dAXVmax) and the maximum diameter of IVC (dIVCmax) were not related to the percentage decrease in MAP; the collapsibility of AXV (AXV-CI) and IVC-CI were positively correlated with MAP changes (correlation coefficients:0.475, 0.577, respectively, p < 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUC) was 0.824 (0.759–0.889) for AXV-CI, and 0.874 (0.820–0.928) for IVC-CI. The optimal threshold for AXV-CI was 31.25% (sensitivity 71.7%, specificity 90.1%), while for IVC-CI was 36.60% (sensitivity 85.9%, specificity 79.0%). Hypotension and down-regulation of MAP during induction can be accurately predicted by AXV-Cl after correction for confounding variables.

Conclusion

Infraclavicular axillary vein diameter has no significant correlation with postanesthesia hypotension, whereas AXV-CI may predict postanesthesia hypotension during gastrointestinal surgery of the elderly.

Trial registration

This study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of China on 05/06/2022 (ChiCTR2200060596).

Peer Review reports

Background

Previous studies have shown that general anesthesia induction-related hypotension (GAIH) often occurs during induction of anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery, with an incidence of about 39.5% [1], and its cause is related to blood volume insufficiency caused by a long period of abstinence from food and drink and gastrointestinal preparation before surgery. At the same time, with the development of medical technology and the continuous acceleration of the population aging, the proportion of elderly gastrointestinal patients in clinical work is increasing. The systemic blood volume of elderly patients decreased with age, and relative volume deficiency exists preoperatively, and prolonged preoperative fasting and abstinence from food and drink for gastrointestinal surgery further lead to preoperative volume deficiency in patients. Hypotension or hypoperfusion during general anesthesia are high risk factors due to the cardiovascular depression and vasodilation or lack of surgical stimulation [2]. In severe cases, this leads to adverse postoperative outcomes such as infarction, cardiac failure, postoperative cognitive dysfunction [3], acute kidney injury, prolonged hospital stay, and threatens to the patient’s life [4, 5]. Therefore, accurate assessment blood volume status in the elderly is critical to predict the occurrence of GAIH in gastrointestinal surgery.

Several studies have shown that the collapsibility index and diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients; and have been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the occurrence of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia and after spinal anesthesia [6, 7]. IVC diameters and its collapsibility index (IVC-CI) have been used as practical predictors of blood volume status in the perioperative period.

However, in practice, factors such as obesity, gastrointestinal pneumoperitoneum, abdominal surgery, and surgical sterile area often cause difficulties in measuring IVC [8, 9]. Therefore, there is a need to find another central vein index instead of IVC to assess the blood volume status of elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Zhu et al. [10] showed that the diameter of infraclavicular axillary vein (AXV) was positively correlated with central venous pressure (CVP) in the supine position, and this correlation continued until after fluid resuscitation, and as the patient’s blood volume increased, the diameter of infraclavicular AXV gradually became larger.

There are fewer national and international studies on ultrasound measurement of AXV diameter and its collapse index to assess volume status in elderly gastrointestinal patients to predict postanesthesia hypotension, and there are still no guidelines to follow. The aim of present trial is to investigate the safety of perioperative fluid management by studying the correlation between ultrasound characteristics of the infraclavicular axillary vein and hypotension in elderly gastrointestinal surgery.

Materials and methods

Research ethics

This experiment was approved by the hospital ethics committee (KY-2022-049-01, 17 May, 2022) and registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry Centre (ChiCTR2200060596). All patients signed an informed consent form.

Patients

Between July 2022 and November 2022, 188 elderly patients aged 65–85 years who met ASA 1–3 criteria for general anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery were recruited at Huai’an No.1 Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Subjects with taking angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), elevated intra-abdominal pressure, severe liver disease, peripheral vascular disease or vascular malformations, pacemaker implantation, autonomic nervous system disorders, signs instability, ejection fraction less than 40%, or unstable angina pectoris were resected.

Study design

All patients underwent ultrasound measurement of the AXV and IVC before induction of general anesthesia. Patients were divided into the hypotensive and non-hypotensive groups according to whether hypotension occurred after induction. The blood pressure (BP) of patients who were resting preoperatively was the baseline value and was continuously monitored after induction. A decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of 20% or more or MAP < 60 mmHg were viewed as hypotension. The incidence of hypotension and the percentage of MAP decrease during the perioperative period were recorded. In the presence of hypotension, an arterial blood sample was taken for blood gas analysis. In the case of hypotension, patients were infused with 300–500 ml of crystalloid or colloidal solution, or given small doses of vasopressors (ephedrine or norepinephrine). We compared measurements in the hypotensive and non-hypotensive groups, including pre-induction AXV and IVC diameter and collapsibility index, hemodynamic indices (MAP, heart rate (HR), CVP, and lactate acid level (Lac)), operation time and intraoperative blood loss, and complications (nausea and vomiting, wound infection and bleeding, deep vein thrombosis, dizziness and headache). ROC curves were used to analyse the predictive value of ultrasound measurements of AXV and IVC for GAIH. Pearson linear correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation of ultrasound measurements and decrease in MAP.

Ultrasound measurements

Electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximetry, bispectral index (BIS), internal jugular vein and radial artery cannulation were performed upon on admission to the operating room. Each patient was conscious, supine, and breathing spontaneously for at least 5 min prior to the start. All patients underwent ultrasound evaluation of the AXV and IVC. A 3–13 MHz linear transducer (Wisonic Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China) was used to measure AXV diameter of subjects in the supine position. The probe was scanned from the centre to the outer third of the clavicle for attaining an optimal cross-sectional view of AXV [11] (Fig. 1a). The IVC was visualized using a convex array probe (1–8 MHz). The probe was positioned at the junction of subcostal eminence and the raphe. A cross-sectional image of the IVC can be achieved at 0.5-3 cm from the right atrium which is close to the junction of the hepatic veins [12] (Fig. 1b). We calculated ultrasonic features of AXV and IVC (maximum and minimum diameters, etc.) by M-mode. The collapsibility index can be obtained by the following formula: collapsibility index = (maximum diameter - minimum diameter) / maximum diameter × 100. All measurements were performed by an anaesthesiologist experienced in ultrasonography. Each index was measured three times and the mean was calculated.

Anesthesia procedure

After ultrasound measurements, the patient was anesthetised using a conventional induction scheme. Midazolam 0.3 mg/kg, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.5 ug/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were administered intravenously sequentially. After loss of reflexes and the muscle relaxation, tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were performed. Remifentanil 0.2–0.5 ug/kg/min, propofol 2–6 mg/kg/h, and cisatracurium benzenesulfonate 0.03 mg/kg/h were used to maintain anesthesia by continuous intravenous pumping until the start of surgery. Intravenous anesthesia was combined with 1–2% sevoflurane inhalation when at the start of surgery. The BIS values were maintained in 40–60 range.

Statistical analysis

Sample size

Preliminary results from 38 subjects gave an AUC of 0.65 for the collapsibility index of AXV(AXV-CI). Thus, 150 patients was required (90% power to detect a difference of 0.2 with an AUC of 0.5 to 0.65 using a two-tailed z-test at the 0.05 significance [13]. 188 patients were included allowing for a 20% drop-out rate.

Data analysis

Normality of data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov one-sample test. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and absolute numbers or percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables were analyzed by independent t-tests after assessment for normality; categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test. Scatter plots were constructed and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to assess the relationship between AXV or IVC results and the downregulations in MAP. ROC curve analyses were used to determine the ability of the maximum diameter of AXV (dAXVmax) and collapsibility index to predict clinically significant GAIH in all patients. A non-parametric test characterised by Zhang DD was used to compare the two ROC curves [14]. The optimal threshold were determined as the critical value maximising the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity-1) [15]. AUC with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. The association of variables with GAIH was determined by binary logistic regression analysis. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, pre-existing cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and baseline MAP were adjusted based on literature review and clinical practice. The decrease in MAP from AXV or IVC measurements and other parameters were predicted by multiple linear regression. Independent predictors included age, ASA physical status, pre-existing CVD, baseline MAP, AXV-CI, IVC-CI, dAXVmax and maximum diameter of IVC (dIVCmax). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 23.0; IBM Corp., USA) and MedCalc (version 20.0; MedCalc Software, Belgium). Significant p-values were set at 0.05.

Results

The study initially included 188 patients and subsequently excluded 15 patients, of whom 6 patients had poor AXV or IVC visualisation, 3 were on ACEI and ARB medications, 4 were temporarily withdrawnl from the study, and 2 had unexpected airway difficulties. Data were analyzed for the remaining 173 patients. Of all patients analysed, 40 were hypertensive disorders, 12 were on thiazide diuretics, 9 were on calcium channel blockers, 12 were on a beta-blockers, and 7 were not any medication. Types of surgery included gastric cancer (n = 41), colon cancer (n = 58), rectal cancer (n = 47), and appendiceal tumor (n = 27). None of the subjects had a baseline MAP below 60 mmHg. Table 1 summarises the demographic characteristics of the patients.

According to hypotensive criteria, 92 (53.2%) patients presented with GAIH. Of these patients, 76 were treated with rapid infusion to normalise MAP, 10 with norepinephrine and 6 with ephedrine.

173 patients were analysed. There was a significant difference in pre-existing CVD between subjects with and without hypotension (p = 0.008). However, there were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA physical status, HR, CVP and Lac levels (Tables 2 and 3). MAP decreased after induction compared to before induction in both groups (p < 0.001). In addition, the decrease in MAP after induction was greater in the hypotensive subjects than in the non-hypotensive subjects (p < 0.001). The dAXVmax or dIVCmax showed no difference between the hypotensive and non-hypotensive groups (P > 0.05); however, AXV-CI (P < 0.001) and IVC-CI (P < 0.001) were higher in patients with hypotension. The percentage of MAP decrease was positively correlated with AXV-CI (r = 0.475, p < 0.001, Fig. 2a) and IVC-CI (r = 0.577, p < 0.001, Fig. 2b).

As shown in Fig. 3, the ROC curve for GAIH showed high accuracy by AXV-CI, with an AUC of 0.824 (95% confidence interval, 0.759–0.889; P < 0.001), and an IVC-CI of 0.874 (95% confidence interval, 0.820–0.928; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of AXV-CI was 31.25% with a sensitivity of 71.7% (68.5 − 87.3%) and a specificity of 90.1% (81.5 − 85.6%). The optimal cutoff value of IVC-CI was 36.60% with a sensitivity of 85.9% (77.0 − 92.3%) and a specificity of 79.0% (68.5 − 87.3%). There was no significant difference in the AUC between AXV-CI and IVC-CI (Z = 1.251, p = 0.211). It was evident that both AXV-CI and IVC-CI have high predictive value for GAIH in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

As shown in Table 4, higher AXV-CI, higher IVC-CI, and preexisting CVD were associated with the development of GAIH. After correction for age, ASA physical status, pre-existing CVD, and baseline MAP, AXV-CI (P < 0.001) and IVC-CI (P < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of GAIH. There was a greater possibility to develop GAIH for patients with a larger collapsibility index, and the odds ratio of AXV-CI was 1.12 (1.07–1.18) while that of IVC-CI was 1.18 (1.11–1.25).

After adjustment for age, ASA physical status, preexisting CVD, and baseline MAP, we found that AXV-CI (P < 0.001), IVC-CI (P < 0.001), and baseline MAP (P = 0.033) were significant predictors of the decrease in MAP after induction of anaesthesia (Table 5).

Discussion

This prospective trial suggests that preoperative AXV-CI was higher in patients who developed GAIH. AXV-CI was a practical predictor of the occurrence of hypotension and percentage decrease in MAP after correction, as was IVC-CI.

In recent years, the volume status of the patient has received more attention in clinical anesthesia when other factors influencing hypotension cannot be modified, as hypotension is partly dependent on volume status [16,17,18]. A previous study found [19] that administration of a certain amount of crystals or colloids during induction of anesthesia can help prevent hypotension and reduce total fluid volume. Intravascular volume is an important consideration in maintaining hemodynamics stability and significant decline in cardiovascular function in elderly patients [20,21,22]. Hypovolemic status is an important factor for GAIH, particularly in gastrointestinal patients. Therefore, accurate assessment of volume status in elderly patients is particularly important in predicting the development of hypotension after anesthesia.

Recently, ultrasound measurements of IVC have become increasingly popular in volume management and fluid therapy [23, 24]. IVC-CI calculated from ultrasound measurements of IVC diameter during spontaneous breathing has been recommended by the American Ultrasound Association as a rapid, non-invasive method of assessing volume status [9]. However, IVC images are usually not well visualised in patients with obesity and gastrointestinal gas collections. In addition, changes in IVC-CI are highly dependent on thoracic and abdominal pressures, which can be influenced by pathophysiological factors such as asthma or respiratory infection.

As a result, some researchers have turned to the infraclavicular AXV, a highly compliant vessel whose volume and hemodynamics vary with humour and respiration. The infraclavicular AXV is located close to the right atrium, and transmural pressure is not affected by intra-abdominal pressure compared to the IVC. In addition, the ultrasound probe compresses the AXV less than other veins (e.g. internal jugular vein), which made the measurements more stable. In 2013, Kent et al. demonstrated that the AXV-CI in the infraclavicular fossa could replace the IVC-CI for assessing the intravascular volume status in critically ill patients, with less measurement bias between the two [11]; furthermore, the time required for imaging and measurement of AXV was shorter than that of the IVC, which was more conducive to timely detection of changes in intravascular volume.

Based on a retrospective analysis of Salmasi and Bijker [25, 26], we defined hypotension as a decrease in MAP of more than 20% from baseline, or below 60 mmHg.

In this study, the incidence of GAIH was 53.2%, which was slightly higher, which may be related to the criteria used for hypotension and the fact that the study population was elderly. AXV-CI and IVC-CI were higher in hypotensive patients. AXV-CI was a significant predictor of hypotension and decrease in MAP (e.g. IVC-CI) after correction.

The AUC for AXV-CI and IVC-CI predicting GAIH were 0.824 and 0.874, respectively, which was close to the previous study on IVC-CI [6], reflecting the good efficacy of AXV-CI and IVC-CI in predicting hypotension. The optimal cut-offs for AXV-CI and IVC-CI were 31.25% and 36.6%, respectively, which were slightly lower than those of the same type of studies. In a study of propofol-induced hypotension by Au et al. [27], patients with IVC-CI ≥ 50% were more likely to have significant hypotension after general anesthesia. This may be related to the type of surgery and the age of the subjects. In addition, it has been shown that a venous collapse index of 30-40% suggests that elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery are at high risk of GAIH and that anaesthetists can use vasopressors in advance or some volumetric preloading to reduce the incidence of hypotension. Comparative analyses of ROC curve areas between AXV-CI and IVC-CI showed that the differences were not statistically significant, suggesting that AXV-CI can be used as a complementary measure when IVC is difficult to obtain. In the present study, dAXVmax and dIVCmax were not associated with reduced MAP or CVP. Zhang et al. showed that dIVCmax could predict GAIH with an optimal cut-off value of 1.8 cm, which is different from our findings. This may be due to the fact that the diameters of IVC and AXV are susceptible to individual factors such as age, sex, height, weight, and waist circumference making the correlation between BP reduction and diameter parameters insignificant [28]. In addition, previous studies have debated whether maximum diameter can accurately assess intravascular volume. Therefore, we conclude that the collapsibility index is a better indicator of volume status than venous diameter.

There was no statistically significant difference in lactate concentration between the two groups before and after induction, due to fluid resuscitation or the use of vasopressors at the onset of hypotension and the fact that the duration of hypotension was too short to cause changes in the circulation.

There are still some limitations. First, it was a single-center study with a small sample size, that study only included older people. If we had been able to do a multicenter with a large-sample size and subgroup analysis, we might have been able to draw more general conclusions. Second, there are many variables behind hypotension, including cardiac tone, volume, and contractility. Although we excluded patients with poor cardiac function, we cannot be sure that the occurrence of hypotension in patients is fully correlated with volume status. Third, the criteria for hypotension used in this study were different from those used in other studies, which may have led to different results. Further prospective studies are needed to validate and extend the results of this study in different clinical settings.

Overall, this study confirms that AXV-CI is similar to the IVC-CI in predicting the occurrence of hypotension and percentage of MAP fall after induction of anesthesia. Therefore, anesthesiologists may choose this convenient method to initially predict the likelihood of hypotension, which also informs perioperative fluid management.

Fig. 1
figure 1

AXV and IVC were measured in M-mode. Measurement of AXV diameter during inspiration (dAXVmin) and expiration (dAXVmax) (a). Measurement of IVC diameter during inspiration (dIVCmin) and expiration (dIVCmax) (b). (dAXVmax, maximum diameter of the axillary vein; dAXVmin, minimum diameter of the axillary vein; dIVCmax, maximum diameter of the inferior vena cava; dIVCmin, minimum diameter of the inferior vena cava)

Full size image
Table 1 Patient demographic data (N = 173)
Full size table
Table 2 The features of subjects with or without hypotension
Full size table
Table 3 Comparison of hemodynamics and ultrasound measurements between patients with or without hypotension
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Scatter plots showing AXV-CI and IVC-CI in relation to the decrease in mean arterial blood pressure. (AXV-CI, collapsibility index of the axillary vein; MAP, mean arterial blood pressure; IVC-CI, collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava. Dashed line is trend line)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic curves indicates the AXV-CI and IVC-CI for predicting hypotension after anesthesia induction. (AXV-CI, collapsibility index of the axillary vein; IVC-CI, collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava)

Full size image
Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predicting hypotension after anaesthesia induction
Full size table
Table 5 Multivariate linear regression model for prediction of a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure after anaesthesia induction
Full size table

Data Availability

All data for this study can be obtained from the corresponding author, based on reasonable reasons.

References

  1. Babazade R, Yilmaz HO, Zimmerman NM, et al. Association between intraoperative low blood pressure and development of Surgical site infection after colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:1058–64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali A, Altiparmak O, Tetik A, et al. Pulse pressure variation and weight-loss percentage predict Hypotension after Anesthesia induction in Neurosurgery Patients: a prospective, observational, blinded study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2017;29:304–1. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Chen L, Sun YY, et al. Comparative effects of fentanyl versus sufentanil on cerebral oxygen saturation and postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing open surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31:1791–800. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s40520-019-01123-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goepfert MS, Richter HP, Eulenburg CZ, et al. Individually optimized hemodynamic therapy reduces complications and length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:824–36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829bd770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, et al. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. J Anesth. 2018;32:673–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00540-018-2532-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J, Critchley LA. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography before general anesthesia can predict hypotension after induction. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:580–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salama ER, Elkashlan M. Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and caval aorta index as new predictors for hypotension after induction of spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36:297–302. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dipti A, Soucy Z, Surana A, et al. Role of inferior vena cava diameter in assessment of volume status:a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:1414–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ajem.2011.10.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seif D, Mailhot T, Perera P, et al. Caval sonography in shock: a noninvasive method for evaluating intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1885–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.7863/jum.2012.31.12.1885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu P, Zhang X, Luan H, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of the subclavian vein diameter forassessment of intravascular volume status in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: comparison with central venous pressure. J Surg Res. 2015;196:102–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kent A, Bahner DP, Boulger CT, et al. Sonographic evaluation of intravascular volume status in the surgical intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of subclavian vein and inferior vena cava collapsibility index. J Surg Res. 2013;184:561–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the canadian society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:685–713. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices. Stat Med. 1997;16:1529–42. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970715)16:13%3C1529::aid-sim565%3E3.0.co;2-h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang DD, Zhou XH, Freeman DH Jr, et al. A non-parametric method for the comparison of partial areas under ROC curves and its application to large health care data sets. Stat Med. 2002;21:701–15. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/sim.1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. YOUDEN WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1%3C32::aid-cncr2820030106%3E3.0.co;2-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nafiu OO, Kheterpal S, Morris M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for preincision hypotension in a noncardiac pediatric surgical population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:232–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02871.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rijs K, Mercier FJ, Lucas DN, et al. Fluid loading therapy to prevent spinal hypotension in women undergoing elective caesarean section: Network meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37:1126–42. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng LZ. Heterogeneous impact of hypotension on organ perfusion and outcomes: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127:845–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. NiShi Kawa K, Yokoama N, Saito S, et al. Comparison of effects of rapid colloid loading before and after spinal anesthesia on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in cesarean section. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007;21:125–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10877-006-9066-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morley AP, Nalla BP, Vamadevan S, et al. The influence of duration of fluid abstinence on hypotension during propofol induction. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1373–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f62a2b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Simpao AF, Wu L, Nelson O, et al. Preoperative fluid fasting Times and Postinduction Low Blood pressure in children: a retrospective analysis. Anesthesiology. 2020;133:523–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dennhardt N, Beck C, Huber D, et al. Optimized preoperative fasting times decrease ketone body concentration and stabilize mean arterial blood pressure during induction of anesthesia in children younger than 36 months: a prospective observational cohort study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26:838–43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/pan.12943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Crit Care. 2015;19:400. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S. Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1164–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00134-016-4357-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, et al. Relationship between intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baseline or absolute thresholds and acute kidney and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:47–65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bijker JB, Persoon S, Peelen LM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and perioperative ischemic stroke after general surgery: a nested case-control study. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:658–64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182472320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Au AK, Steinberg D, Thom C, et al. Ultrasound measurement of inferior vena cava collapse predicts propofol-induced hypotension. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:1125–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.03.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gui JJ, Guo JG, Nong FQ, et al. Impact of individual characteristics on sonographic IVC diameter and the IVC diameter/aorta diameter index. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33:1602–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all participants and researchers in this study for their hard work.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huaian No.1 Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 223300, Huaian, Jiangsu, China

    Huijuan Chen, Xianlong Zhang, Lei Wang, Cuijuan Zheng & Wei Cheng

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, 210002, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Shenquan Cai

Authors
  1. Huijuan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xianlong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cuijuan Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shenquan Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Huijuan Chen: designed the study and wrote manuscript. Xianlong Zhang: ultrasonic measurements; Lei Wang and Cuijuan Zhen: data collection and analysis; Shenquan Cai: statistical treatment; Wei Cheng: designed research and revised manuscript.All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this observational study (KY-2022-049-01) was provided by the local ethics committee of the Affiliated Huaian No.1 Hospital of Nanjing Medical University in 17/05/2022. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of China (registrationnumber, ChiCTR2200060596) in 05/06/2022. All patients signed informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Zhang, X., Wang, L. et al. Association of infraclavicular axillary vein diameter and collapsibility index with general anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 340 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12871-023-02303-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12871-023-02303-w

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us