Skip to main content

Table 2 GRADE evidence profile of all outcomes

From: Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in adult patients received elective surgeries: a meta‑analysis

No of studies

Study design

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

RoB

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Ciprofol

Propofol

Relative

(95% CI)

Absolute

(95% CI)

Successful induction rate

6

RCT

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

publication bias strongly suspecteda

388/388 (100.0%)

324/324 (100.0%)

RR 1.00

(0.99 to 1.01)

0 fewer per 1,000

(from 10 fewer to 10 more)

Moderate

Critical

Time to onset of successful induction

6

RCT

not serious

seriousb

not serious

not serious

none

388

324

-

MD 3.08 s higher

(0.93 lower to 7.09 higher)

Moderate

Critical

Time to disappearance of eyelash reflex

3

RCT

not serious

seriousc

not serious

not serious

none

208

208

-

MD 0.55 s higher

(1.5 lower to 2.6 higher)

Moderate

Critical

Overall estimated mean in BIS

6

RCT

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

388

324

-

MD 3.79 lower

(4.57 lower to 3.01 lower)

High

Critical

Time to full alertness

3

RCT

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

180

116

-

MD 0.67 min higher

(0.03 lower to 1.36 higher)

High

Critical

Incidence of hypotension

6

RCT

not serious

seriousb

not serious

not serious

none

106/388 (27.3%)

127/324 (39.2%)

RR 0.63

(0.42 to 0.94)

145 fewer per 1,000

(from 227 fewer to 24 fewer)

Moderate

Important

Incidence of arrhythmia

6

RCT

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

44/388 (11.3%)

41/324 (12.7%)

RR 0.81

(0.55 to 1.21)

24 fewer per 1,000

(from 57 fewer to 27 more)

High

Important

Incidence of injection-site pain

6

RCT

not serious

seriousa

not serious

not serious

none

34/388 (8.8%)

146/324 (45.1%)

RR 0.26

(0.14 to 0.47)

333 fewer per 1,000

(from 388 fewer to 239 fewer)

Moderate

Important

  1. RoB, risk of bias; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; RR, risk ratio
  2. Explanations
  3. a. Egger’s test shows the risk of publication bias
  4. b. An inconsistency factor of 66% was estimated
  5. c. An inconsistency factor of 47% was estimated