Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of findings

From: The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis

Certainty assessment

No. of patients

Effect

Certainty

No. of studies

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

remimazolam

propofol

Relative (95% CI)

Absolute (95% CI)

Respiratory depression

10 RCTs

seriousa

not serious

not serious

not serious

strong association

40/653 (6.1%)

132/652 (20.2%)

RR 0.40 (0.28 to 0.57)

121 fewer per 1,000 (from 146 to 87 fewer)

      High

Hypoxemia

10 RCTs

seriousa

not serious

not serious

not serious

strong association

35/629 (5.6%)

118/610 (19.3%)

RR 0.34 (0.23 to 0.49)

128 fewer per 1,000 (from 149 to 99 fewer)

      High

Bradycardia

13 RCTs

seriousa

not serious

not serious

not serious

strong association

27/843 (3.2%)

84/824 (10.2%)

RR 0.34 (0.23 to 0.51)

67 fewer per 1,000 (from 78 to 50 fewer)

      High

Dizziness

7 RCTs

seriousa

not serious

not serious

not serious

strong association

34/785 (4.3%)

81/788 (10.3%)

RR 0.45 (0.31 to 0.65)

57 fewer per 1,000 (from 71 to 36 fewer)

      High

Injection pain

14 RCTs

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

not serious

very strong association

30/735 (4.1%)

369/736 (50.1%)

RR 0.06 (0.03 to 0.13)

471 fewer per 1,000 (from 486 to 436 fewer)

      High

Nausea or vomiting

15 RCTs

seriousa

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

109/1393 (7.8%)

145/1380 (10.5%)

RR 0.79 (0.62 to 1.00)

22 fewer per 1,000 (from 40 to 0 fewer)

      Moderate

Hypotension

18 RCTs

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

not serious

publication bias strongly suspected cstrong association

189/1506 (12.5%)

425/1487 (28.6%)

RR 0.36 (0.26 to 0.48)

183 fewer per 1,000 (from 211 to 149 fewer)

      Low

  1. Explanations
  2. aMost information is from studies at moderate risk of bias
  3. bHigh heterogeneity(I-squard > 50%)
  4. cPublication bias detected by Harbord test