Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of subgroup analysis

From: Anion gap as a prognostic tool for risk stratification in critically ill patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study characteristic

Groups

Studies (nr)

Total sample size

Pooled AUC (95 % CIs)

I2 test

P-value

Study setting

Trauma patients

9, 10, 15

787

0.83 (0.68, 0.99)

97 %

0.0235

ICU patients

4, 5, 12, 16, 17

1474

0.66 (0.59, 0.73)

69 %

Age

Mean/Median age 30–40 years

5, 9, 10, 15

1055

0.81 (0.69, 0.93)

97 %

0.0114

Mean/Median age 60–70 years

4, 8, 12, 16, 17

1878

0.66 (0.60, 0.71)

70 %

Intravenous fluids restriction

Restriction

9, 10

356

0.91 (0.8, 1.0)

95 %

0.0008

No restriction

4, 5, 8, 12, 15, 16, 17

2573

0.67 (0.62, 0.72)

68 %

Intravenous fluids restriction and AG measured before treatment initiation

Restriction and AG measurement before hospital treatment initiation

5, 8, 9, 10

1296

0.83 (0.73, 0.93)

98 %

<0.0001

No restriction or AG measured after treatment was commenced

4, 12, 15, 16, 17

1633

0.63 (0.60, 0.66)

0 %

Routine use of gelatin-based intravenous fluids in study country

Gelatins not routinely used

12, 15

1091

0.62 (0.58, 0.65)

0 %

0.3344

Gelatins routinely used

4, 16, 17

542

0.65 (0.6, 0.7)

0 %

Outcome measure

Time frame stated e.g. 31-day or 28-day mortality

4, 9, 10, 12, 16

1266

0.74 (0.52, 0.96)

99 %

0.6518

In-hospital mortality

8, 15, 17

1399

0.69 (0.64, 0.75)

44 %

Overall mortality in study population

Below 30 %

5, 8, 9, 12, 15, 17

2613

0.74 (0.55, 0.93)

99 %

0.8856

Above 30 %

4, 10, 16

320

0.70 (0.57, 0.84)

83 %

Date of publication

Before and including 2005

4, 5, 8, 9, 15

1710

0.76 (0.59, 0.94)

98 %

0.4325

2006 and after

10, 12, 16, 17

1184

0.67 (0.58, 0.77)

87 %

  1. CIs confidence intervals, ICU intensive care unit